This work is devoted to the problem of the shortcomings of the current regulatory and methodological literature, which complicate the conduct of construction and technical judicial expertise. On the example of the building in Rostov-on-Don, the shortcomings of the normative and methodological literature in the areas of possible use of modern equipment for the inspection of structures are shown. This lack of the necessary normative literature in the field of non-destructive testing is clearly shown. This article shows the difficulties which experts face due to the indicated shortcomings. Conclusions based on the results of the study are made.

Keywords: cconstruction and technical expertise, normative literature, methodical literature, laser scanners, non-destructive control, masonry

This work considers the controversial situations in the field of construction control, technical supervision and оbtaining a commissioning permit. The problematic situation, in which there was no (partially or completely) construction control at the construction stage, is considered. The difficulties of obtaining a Conclusion on Compliance in a similar situation and appealing the decision of the technical supervision authorities in court are picked out. Poor elaboration of mechanisms for obtaining a Conclusion on Compliance in the absence of construction control is noted. The shortcomings of the existing document and the lack of a prescribed legal status of the construction and technical expertise are highlighted. The ways of solving the existing problem at the legislative level are offered. Amending the existing legislative framework, reforms of existing or creating new mechanisms for resolving problematic situations in the absence of construction control are suggested as the main solutions.

Keywords: construction control, technical supervision, construction and technical expertise, commissioning, Conclusion on Compliance, amendment to the legislative framework