This paper describes approaches to visualization and comparison of semantic trees reflecting the component structure of the patented device and the connections between them using graph databases. DBMS data uses graph structures to store, process, and represent data. The main elements of a graph database are nodes and edges, which, within the framework of the task, model entities of 3 types (SYSTEM, COMPONENT, ATTRIBUTE) and 5 types of connections (PART-OF, LOCATED-AT, CONNECTED-WITH, ATTRIBUTE-FOR, IN-MANNER-OF). According to the results of the study, it can be stated that Neo4j demonstrates the best possibilities for graph visualization; ArangoDB, despite correctly entered queries, performs incomplete visualization; AllegroGraph showed difficult work with code, difficult configuration of graph tree visualization. 3 algorithms for comparing graph representations of information have been tested: Graph Edit Distance, Topological Comparison, Subgraph Isomorphism. The algorithms are implemented in python, compares 2 graph trees, displays visualization and analysis of common graph structures and differences.
Keywords: semantic tree, component structure, patent, graph databases, Neo4j, AllegroGraph, ArangoDB